YouDebateIt.com Return To Home Page

YouDebateIt.com -- What, If Any, Changes Should Be Made To The US Social Security System?
Topic: What, If Any, Changes Should Be Made To The US Social Security System?

Which do you prefer #1 or #2?
Vote below for the better argument.
Opinion #1
Debater: Argue

Social Security Does NOT Lead to Communism and Fascism
Social Security is a fine way to give money to retired people. It would NOT lead to communism. You don't even know what communism is! In a communist society, wealth is equal with everyone. No one is more or less wealthy. With social security, people's wealth is raised, and therefore, it goes right against communism. Social Security isn't going to cause the government to outlaw burial and marriage. They have absolutely no connection. Furthermore, Fascism and Communism are totally different things. You can't have a "Fascist Communism" or "Fascist Commies" simply because they are entirely different systems. Social Security won't lead to laziness. Whether you have it or not you can't get out of doing work, retired or not. Finally, we have had Social Security for, what, 70 years? And we are anything but a communist society. People are still married and still getting buried.
Opinion #2
Debater: The Wild Goose

Social Security is ultimately self-defeating.
I have already explored Social Security's structural similarity with a pyramid scheme, or "Ponzi Racket". The key difference, of course, is that people are forced to continue paying into Social Security, which in theory should sustain it- any Ponzi scheme can work as long as it has an ever-expanding pool of suckers buying into it.

The problem with this is that the pool of compulsory "suckers" entering Social Security is not expanding, but contracting- fertility rates in most Western nations are plummeting. Interestingly, there is a very strong correlation between increased Social Security payments and decreased fertility rates. The reason, of course, is that Social Security destroys the incentives to have children (see my other arguments and the supporting URL). Eventually, SS will collapse.

To stave off the collapse of the system, many Western nations with Social Security programs are importing huge numbers of immigrants, but this, too, is a short-term fix to a deeper problem
Supporting URL[s]:
http://www.mises.org
Which argument do you agree with more? #1   #2
Which argument is more persuasive? #1   #2
READ ALL ARGUMENTS ON THIS TOPIC
POST YOUR COUNTERARGUMENT TO THE MOST RECENT ARGUMENT ON THIS TOPIC
START A NEW OR SEPARATE ARGUMENT ON THIS TOPIC
READ & JUDGE OTHER COMPLETED DEBATES

PROPOSE ANOTHER DEBATE TOPIC
Share your view. Whose argument did you like better? I strongly prefer the argument of debater #1
I strongly prefer the argument of debater #2
I slightly prefer the argument of debater #1
I slightly prefer the argument of debater #2
I prefer the argument of debater #1, but I could do better!
I prefer the argument of debater #2, but I could do better!

  
Your comments will appear on SelectSmart.com. Look for ''Visitor Reviews''.


Welcome to YouDebateIt.com
This is the place for debate with an added element of friendly competition. This is a debating and essay resource and practice tool, not a debating society or club. There are no complicated rules, but these debates have structure. Each debate consists of a topic with two opposing views.

These are short essays limited to about 150-165 words. Present your strongest argument the first time, since you can't go back to change it--as with the National Forensic League and other speech and debate formats. Read these debates, then vote for your favorite arguments.

These debates are fun, informative and give exposure to all sides of the issues. Most debates will be archived (arguments that are obscene or offensive may be deleted). The better and more interesting debates will be featured.