YouDebateIt.com Return To Home Page

YouDebateIt.com -- What, If Any, Changes Should Be Made To The US Social Security System?
Topic: What, If Any, Changes Should Be Made To The US Social Security System?

Which do you prefer #1 or #2?
Vote below for the better argument.
Opinion #1
Debater: paraquat99

Social Security helps more than just the elderly.
Anyone who knows someone disabled, widowed, orphaned or elderly knows Social Security is a successful gov't. program that guarantees a supplemental income the private sector cannot. But isn’t Social Security going broke? No. Actuaries note that the current Fund holds enough to payout full benefits until 2042. Then, without changes, 75% of benefits will be paid out. Social Security cannot go broke because payroll taxes will continue to be collected. True more will retire and live longer than previous generations, but such concerns were addressed in 1983. At that time, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan compelled Congress to raise payroll taxes to 12.4% to build Trust Fund reserves. To guarantee benefits after 2042, Congress needs only raise the amount of income subject to Social Security tax and raise the payroll tax less than one-quarter of the amount it did in the 80s. Social Security is welfare everyone who pays into and benefits from. It has nothing to do with "laziness."
Opinion #2
Debater: Jtaylor1

Social Security hurts the Treasury Department
If elders who wanted retirement benifits, medical insurance, and a well affordable retirement home, they should get a retirement job. As for the disabled, the widowed, and the orphans, will they get benifits from Social Security by robbing the Treasury Deparment? No. They should do the same as the elders. If the orphans, the widows, and the disabled wants to get a good benifit and well affordable homes, they should get jobs like the rest of us especially the elders. The treasury department is not a bank for the lazy homeless sloths who complain about everything. For example, if they want food, they should get a job. They are responsible grownups, not slackers and so called hobos. Do we want hobos stealing money from the Treasury Deparment? I take that as a "NO". In conclusion, Social Security hurts the Treasury Department.
Which argument do you agree with more? #1   #2
Which argument is more persuasive? #1   #2
READ ALL ARGUMENTS ON THIS TOPIC
POST YOUR COUNTERARGUMENT TO THE MOST RECENT ARGUMENT ON THIS TOPIC
START A NEW OR SEPARATE ARGUMENT ON THIS TOPIC
READ & JUDGE OTHER COMPLETED DEBATES

PROPOSE ANOTHER DEBATE TOPIC
Share your view. Whose argument did you like better? I strongly prefer the argument of debater #1
I strongly prefer the argument of debater #2
I slightly prefer the argument of debater #1
I slightly prefer the argument of debater #2
I prefer the argument of debater #1, but I could do better!
I prefer the argument of debater #2, but I could do better!

  
Your comments will appear on SelectSmart.com. Look for ''Visitor Reviews''.


Welcome to YouDebateIt.com
This is the place for debate with an added element of friendly competition. This is a debating and essay resource and practice tool, not a debating society or club. There are no complicated rules, but these debates have structure. Each debate consists of a topic with two opposing views.

These are short essays limited to about 150-165 words. Present your strongest argument the first time, since you can't go back to change it--as with the National Forensic League and other speech and debate formats. Read these debates, then vote for your favorite arguments.

These debates are fun, informative and give exposure to all sides of the issues. Most debates will be archived (arguments that are obscene or offensive may be deleted). The better and more interesting debates will be featured.