YouDebateIt.com Return To Home Page

YouDebateIt.com -- What, If Any, Changes Should Be Made To The US Social Security System?
Topic: What, If Any, Changes Should Be Made To The US Social Security System?

Which do you prefer #1 or #2?
Vote below for the better argument.
Opinion #1
Debater: Jtaylor1

Destroy all of the government's most effective programs
Private investments can waste more money over time than Social Security. Enron stockholders show how those investments are not working at all. The point of Social Security isn't just fraud; it's the conspiracy that as a *whoremonger* to a greedy americans debt, theft and unfair taxes. It's a bad thing. The problem with democracy now is they keep secrets from the government was like for the celebrities BEFORE SS. The poverty rate for the american was higher than it is today; the americans were less independent and more of a financial sodom on their greed. To make SS effective would cause bankruptsy. SS is not Fort Knox but a fraud by current taxpayers for those now poor. The NYSE states it's worst in present-form until 2012. More folks are greedy but the U.S. economy continues to fall 2.4%/year. Raise the minumum wage. Raise taxes on incomes over $1,000,000,000. Decrease immigration. Don't just criticise a 300-year old, unsuccessful gov't program. Destroy the economy.
Opinion #2
Debater: paraquat99

Social Security wouldn't be secure if it was privatized.
Apparently, the Special Olympics rejects (i.e. Jtaylor1) are in town today to debate Social Security. For the rest of us, who like to argue so others can clearly understand it, why would anyone want to dismantle Social Security? Americans like the system. The system, in 70-years, has never faltered. And only the minority, the wealthy elite, would even benefit from its being dismantled. If we replaced it with private accounts, wouldn't the government merely be enriching private investment firms/banks who'd have to manage said "accounts" for investor fees. Next, what if these investments in the Stock Market failed? How would elderly folks retire and supplement their incomes? What about the disabled and children of deceased parents? Without workers paying into a SS system, how would they survive? Private charities would be overwhelmed (as they were before SS), and the old, crippled and orphaned wouldn't have the funds for housing, food and transportation. SS wouldn't be SS if privatized!
Which argument do you agree with more? #1   #2
Which argument is more persuasive? #1   #2
READ ALL ARGUMENTS ON THIS TOPIC
POST YOUR COUNTERARGUMENT TO THE MOST RECENT ARGUMENT ON THIS TOPIC
START A NEW OR SEPARATE ARGUMENT ON THIS TOPIC
READ & JUDGE OTHER COMPLETED DEBATES

PROPOSE ANOTHER DEBATE TOPIC
Share your view. Whose argument did you like better? I strongly prefer the argument of debater #1
I strongly prefer the argument of debater #2
I slightly prefer the argument of debater #1
I slightly prefer the argument of debater #2
I prefer the argument of debater #1, but I could do better!
I prefer the argument of debater #2, but I could do better!

  
Your comments will appear on SelectSmart.com. Look for ''Visitor Reviews''.


Welcome to YouDebateIt.com
This is the place for debate with an added element of friendly competition. This is a debating and essay resource and practice tool, not a debating society or club. There are no complicated rules, but these debates have structure. Each debate consists of a topic with two opposing views.

These are short essays limited to about 150-165 words. Present your strongest argument the first time, since you can't go back to change it--as with the National Forensic League and other speech and debate formats. Read these debates, then vote for your favorite arguments.

These debates are fun, informative and give exposure to all sides of the issues. Most debates will be archived (arguments that are obscene or offensive may be deleted). The better and more interesting debates will be featured.