YouDebateIt.com Return To Home Page

YouDebateIt.com -- What, If Any, Changes Should Be Made To The US Social Security System?
Topic: What, If Any, Changes Should Be Made To The US Social Security System?

Which do you prefer #1 or #2?
Vote below for the better argument.
Opinion #1
Debater: paraquat99

The "problems" with S.S. are short-term, shortsighted and exaggerated.
Although I pretty much classify myself as a liberal-Libertarian, I support the Social Security system as it stands. As such, I find it disturbing that people in their 20s and 30s today so easily buy the conservative movement's twenty-year perpetuated distortion that Social Security won't be there for them. The fact is 70% of the "Boomers" now starting to retire had at least 2 children. Those children as workers will thereby supplement roughly 2/3rds of the Boomers S.S. checks until they die off in 25-35 years. The other 1/3rd can be compensated for by: 1) Raising the age to collect S.S. to around 68 years old(the average life expectancy of Americans today is 75-80, much higher than it was in 1935 when S.S. started); 2) Raising the S.S. income cap and begin collecting S.S. from those now making six-figures; and lastly 3) Boosting the amount of S.S. payroll tax 1-2% from current workers and employers under generational sunset conditions. To privatize or phase-out S.S. is shortsighted.
Opinion #2
Debater: The Wild Goose

Social Security destroys the fabric of society.
In a normal society, people are cared for by their communities and families when they become old or infirm. People are cared for by their children, or by their local charities, or by their churches. They receive this care because they have spent their lifetimes cultivating good ties with these institutions. Therefore there is an incentive to be a good parent and an upstanding member of one's community. Those who don't maintain good ties with their children, or who deliberately anger their communities, are less likely to be able to obtain care late in life.

Social Security and other programs like it, however, destroy these incentives. When all the elderly are cared for from a common pool, a misanthrope with no children gets just as much support as a dedicated father who was a pillar of his community. This destroys the system of incentives that makes society function, in addition to all the practical considerations that make Social Security problematic. By all means, read the URL below.
Supporting URL[s]:
http://www.mises.org
Which argument do you agree with more? #1   #2
Which argument is more persuasive? #1   #2
READ ALL ARGUMENTS ON THIS TOPIC
POST YOUR COUNTERARGUMENT TO THE MOST RECENT ARGUMENT ON THIS TOPIC
START A NEW OR SEPARATE ARGUMENT ON THIS TOPIC
READ & JUDGE OTHER COMPLETED DEBATES

PROPOSE ANOTHER DEBATE TOPIC
Share your view. Whose argument did you like better? I strongly prefer the argument of debater #1
I strongly prefer the argument of debater #2
I slightly prefer the argument of debater #1
I slightly prefer the argument of debater #2
I prefer the argument of debater #1, but I could do better!
I prefer the argument of debater #2, but I could do better!

  
Your comments will appear on SelectSmart.com. Look for ''Visitor Reviews''.


Welcome to YouDebateIt.com
This is the place for debate with an added element of friendly competition. This is a debating and essay resource and practice tool, not a debating society or club. There are no complicated rules, but these debates have structure. Each debate consists of a topic with two opposing views.

These are short essays limited to about 150-165 words. Present your strongest argument the first time, since you can't go back to change it--as with the National Forensic League and other speech and debate formats. Read these debates, then vote for your favorite arguments.

These debates are fun, informative and give exposure to all sides of the issues. Most debates will be archived (arguments that are obscene or offensive may be deleted). The better and more interesting debates will be featured.