YouDebateIt.com Return To Home Page

    Debates for
    Should a voucher system be used to give parents a choice of schools?

    (Newest argument listed last)
    #1 Argument Headline  #2 Argument Headline
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] School Vouchers Aid the Poor and Underprivileged vs. Vouchers are anti-public education
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] Vouchers are anti-public education vs. Vouchers are pro-education
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] Vouchers are pro-education vs. Taking from the poor to subsidise the rich
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] Taking from the poor to subsidise the rich vs. Vouchers are only necessary to ensure education for the poor.
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] Vouchers are only necessary to ensure education for the poor. vs. There is a flaw with public education as a whole.
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] There is a flaw with public education as a whole. vs. It can be, but here's the rub
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] It can be, but here's the rub vs. Vouchers destroy effective private education.
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] Vouchers destroy effective private education. vs. The Voucher System should be a good cause and enforcement of public edu.
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] The Voucher System should be a good cause and enforcement of public edu. vs. Vouchers wasted taxpayer dollars and fund extremist schools.
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] Vouchers wasted taxpayer dollars and fund extremist schools. vs. Vouchers should remain a good cause for fundamental Marxism and Jediism
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] Vouchers should remain a good cause for fundamental Marxism and Jediism vs. Marx is dead. Yoda is not god. Light sabres cost too much $$$. No vouchers!
    [ VIEW & VOTE ] Marx is dead. Yoda is not god. Light sabres cost too much $$$. No vouchers! vs. Democracy causes overpopulation. Marxism does not.

    [ PROPOSE ANOTHER DEBATE TOPIC ] [ LIST OPEN DEBATES ][ READ & JUDGE OTHER DEBATES ]






    Welcome to YouDebateIt.com
    This is the place for debate with an added element of friendly competition. This is a debating and essay resource and practice tool, not a debating society or club. There are no complicated rules, but these debates have structure. Each debate consists of a topic with two opposing views.

    These are short essays limited to about 150-165 words. Present your strongest argument the first time, since you can't go back to change it--as with the National Forensic League and other speech and debate formats. Read these debates, then vote for your favorite arguments.

    These debates are fun, informative and give exposure to all sides of the issues. Most debates will be archived (arguments that are obscene or offensive may be deleted). The better and more interesting debates will be featured.